Keynote Speakers

Professor Alistair Paterson

Complicating Contact: Archaeology Across Humanity’s Last Great Global Interface

Australia gazes into the recent past through the tools of archaeology and history, in parallel with Indigenous knowledge and critique. This is ‘shallow time’–a distinct counterpoint to deep time. ‘Contact’ has operated conceptually as a moment, as an interface, and as a zone–as a mediation between the deep past and pernicious histories of invasion, colonisation, colonialism and empire. It encompasses contexts where different people and groups exist in distinctly new relations to each other, occupying qualitatively different positions. It’s the beginning of Australia’s place in global chains of knowledge, identity and commodities. ‘Contact’ captures the most profound social and environmental changes the continent has experienced. This keynote considers the place of Australia globally in the conceptualisation of contact studies, using the lens of archaeological work in Northwestern Australia to build on Patrick Wolfe’s conceptualization of settler colonialism’s enduring ‘structures’ to highlight how archaeology can help illuminate the locations and characteristics of this history.

Denis Rose

William Bell

A Journey Through Time

Denis Rose has worked with many Archaeologists since 1974 when he commenced employment as a Sites Record Officer in the newly established Archaeological and Aboriginal Relics Office in Victoria.  I am going to speak of my experiences throughout the years concluding with the successful inscription of the Budj Bim Cultural Landscape on the UNESCO World Heritage List in 2019.

There have been many changes, mostly positive, over the years in the way that Archaeologists have interacted with Traditional Owners and vice versa.  My presentation will  highlight a few examples of these interactions, the good and the not so good, and is based on personal observations. These examples include; the early days of the Archaeological and Aboriginal Relics Office; managing cultural heritage in Discovery Bay Coastal Park; Alcoa Aluminium Smelter and the Onus v. Alcoa High Court decision; Gariwerd Rock Art management in the 1990s and the Budj Bim Cultural Landscape World Heritage listing

Peter Jeffries

Amy Stevens

Risk vs Reward: The Relative Value of World Heritage Listing

The concept of risk vs reward is a familiar one for archaeologists who’s roles involve decisions that impact on the evidential remains left by our ancestors’ actions and information in times past. The decision to pursue World Heritage for Murujuga seems like an easy one, and there is no doubt that World Heritage Listing of a property is a sensible way to ensure universal recognition of its values and the long-term protection of its physical properties. The process of pursuing World Heritage Listing however, raises serious questions about how inherently colonial institutions and regulatory processes can recognise and protect Indigenous values as well as scientific and archaeological values. A case study at Murujuga examines how World Heritage Listing and the focus on protection of physical attributes comes with risk to significant intangible values, agency and decision making over country in accordance with cultural tradition.

Have a question

Contact Us

Contact the Conference Organiser, Julie Jerbic

0402 189 948

Email Here

AAA Website